AMD RDNA 4 (RX 8000...
 
Notifications
Clear all

AMD RDNA 4 (RX 8000 Series) - Rumors and Speculation

8 Posts
9 Users
7 Reactions
124 Views
1
Topic starter

I just searched on the web about upcoming AMD RDNA 4 Radeon RX 8000 series, and here are some specs and rumors:

  • RDNA 4 is expected to launch in the second half of 2024, possibly in Q3 or Q4.
  • The lineup may consist of two main GPUs: Navi 48 (possibly RX 8800 XT) and Navi 44 (possibly RX 8700 XT).
  • Navi 48 is rumored to have a 256-bit memory bus with GDDR6 memory, while Navi 44 may have a 128-bit bus.
  • Clock speeds could reach up to 3GHz-3.3GHz on overclocked partner models.
  • AMD is said to be focusing on the midrange market, with competitive pricing around $400-$500.
  • The architecture is expected to be monolithic, built on TSMC's N4P process.
  • Performance-wise, the RX 8800 XT may be close to the RX 7900 XT, outperforming the RTX 4070 Ti Super.
  • Ray tracing performance is expected to improve by 10%-30% compared to RDNA 3.

What are your thoughts on these rumors? Are you excited about AMD's next-gen GPUs?

5 Answers
3

I'm a bit disappointed that AMD might not be targeting the high-end market this time around. I was hoping to see a successor to the RX 7900 XTX that could rival Nvidia's top offerings. But if they can significantly improve ray tracing performance and offer better price-to-performance, I guess that's still a win for consumers.

show_me_2 show_me_2 22/05/2024 1:39 pm

@daxq NVIDA also rumored to not release flagship RTX 5090 first.

2

Thanks for sharing these rumors and specs about the upcoming AMD RDNA 4 Radeon RX 8000 series! A few thoughts:

Launch Timing and Lineup

  • Launching in late 2024 (Q3/Q4) seems reasonable, giving AMD time to further refine the architecture.
  • Having two main GPUs (Navi 48 and Navi 44) targeting different segments makes sense strategically.

Specs and Technology

  • The 256-bit bus with GDDR6 for Navi 48 and 128-bit for Navi 44 aligns with positioning them as higher-end and midrange offerings respectively.
  • 3GHz+ clocks on partner cards would be impressive if they can pull it off with good power efficiency.
  • Monolithic design on TSMC N4P sounds like a proven approach, leveraging a mature node for cost and yields.

Pricing and Positioning

  • Focusing on the midrange around the $400-500 price point is smart. Lots of volume and less competition there.
  • AMD needs compelling options to counter the inevitable RTX 4070 Ti Super and whatever else Nvidia releases.

Performance

  • If the RX 8800 XT can match the RX 7900 XT and beat a 4070 Ti Super, that would be a very strong showing.
  • 10-30% ray tracing uplift over RDNA 3 is decent, but AMD still needs to close the RT gap with Nvidia.

Overall, I'm cautiously optimistic about RDNA 4 based on these rumors. The specs sound reasonable, and the pricing and performance targets make sense. As always, waiting for independent reviews is wise. But I'm excited to see how RDNA 4 turns out and if it can keep AMD competitive in the GPU market through 2024 and beyond.

1

The rumored specs for Navi 48 and Navi 44 look promising. If AMD can achieve those clock speeds and improve the architecture, we could see some impressive gains over RDNA 3. I'm curious to see how they'll stack up against Nvidia's upcoming RTX 50-series cards.

0

So there will be no RX 8900 XTX / RX 8900 XT ?

Avatar Billy Jonson 21/04/2024 12:51 pm

@Wyatt Why there is no high-end models ?

HexHexHex HexHexHex 06/05/2024 4:35 am

@Wyatt Latest rumors suggest no high-end models in late 2024, maybe AMD will release them later.

0

I expect consumer GPU development and performance to be disappointing in the coming years due to a few industry trends:

  1. GPU makers are prioritizing AI and data center products over consumer cards, so development resources and advanced fabrication for gaming GPUs is reduced.

  2. High demand for AI accelerators is driving up chip fabrication costs, which translates to pricier consumer cards as well.

  3. Supply limitations on advanced memory like GDDR7 keeps costs too high for feasible use in mid-range consumer cards in the near future.

On the positive side, growth in advanced memory like HBM for AI purposes may ultimately improve supply and reduce costs enough to reemerge in high-end consumer cards in a few generations.

Share: